Dance of Difference

Author:Baecker, Andreas

Article Title:Dance of Difference

Abstract:
Context center dot In the conventional sciences, artistic work and aesthetic experience are explained from different theoodological constraints of Science I, it is hardly possible to develop an integrative theory that coordinates the complex relational interplay of multi-layered systemic processes in the field of art. Various descriptions and explanations at different levels of artistic work and aesthetic experience will be integrated into an approach to a systems theory of art within the framework of Science II. > Method center dot First-person observations and coordination of doings in the performing arts and various theoretical explanations of their artistic work and aesthetic practice at different system levels are re-entered, coordinated, and consistently explained in terms of Science II. > Results center dot The first-person observations of the performance Soul Chain and the theoretical views of structural determinism, second-order cybernetics, the interpenetration of psychic and social systems, deconstructive differance, and the autopoietic feedback loop are re-framed in Science II. As reflections of specific generative mechanisms, they are integrated into a systems-theoretical approach that explains the performing arts and aesthetic practice through the mechanism of self-reflexive recursive coordination of structural relations. > Implications center dot The general generative mechanism of recursive coordination of structural relations explains the self-constitution of human existence at all domains and levels, including the process of explaining. Science II allows for a higher-order integration and generality of theories than the conventional science under the subject-object-epistemology paradigm. > Constructivist content center dot The possibility of consistently coordinating and explaining the first-person and theoretical observations of art and aesthetic practice at the different levels of systemic self-constitution in Science II confirms its claim to central theoretical relevance.

Keywords:  recursion; structural relations; Science II; structural determinism; eigenbehavior.; Autopoiesis; differance

DOI: 

Source:CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS

Welcome to correct the error, please contact email: humanisticspider@gmail.com