Article Title：Colonial Vices Sketches of a General Consideration
Abstract：
In this article, Carlos Pereda introduces the concept of colonial reason and explores how philosophical practices and modes of thought are entwined with colonial political structures of exploitation, exclusion, and oppression. Pereda argues that philosophy in Latin America risks perpetuating and reinforcing the colonial gesture, either by turning to the European centers of thought (thus pursuing debates that always take place elsewhere) or by isolating itself and idealising the own. According to Pereda, both approaches fail to dismantle colonial violence within philosophy. In his alternative approach, Pereda outlines principles and methodological criteria for the decolonisation of reason and philosophy. He emphasises the importance of methodological prudence that discerns between innocent, paralysing, and strategic uses of identity expressions and advocates for modes of reading and argumentation that conceive philosophy as an inclusive and ongoing dialogue. In Pereda's terminology, this entails fostering permeable reason that manifests itself through nomadic thinking, a form of thinking that is capable of questioning itself and being questioned.
Keywords: arrogant reason; colonial vices; porous reason; nomadic thought
DOI: 10.1515/dzph-2024-0007
Source：DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE
Welcome to correct the error, please contact email: humanisticspider@gmail.com
