Article Title：Naturalism need not be made safe: A response to William Rottschaefer's misunderstandings
Abstract：
In this article, I respond to William Rottschaefer's analysis of my writings on religion and science, especially my Religion, Science and Naturalism (1996). I show that I am not trying to make naturalism safe, as Rottschaefer contends, but rather attempting to explore options available when one endorses naturalistic approaches. I also explain why I object to the label supernaturalistic naturalism used by Rottschaefer. Possible limitations to naturalistic projects are discussed, not as limitations imposed but rather as features uncovered.
Keywords: empirical theology; limit questions; naturalism; William Rottschaefer; supernaturalism; underdetermination
DOI: 10.1111/0591-2385.00372
Source：ZYGON
Welcome to correct the error, please contact email: humanisticspider@gmail.com
