Article Title：Generalization in ecology and evolutionary biology:: From hypothesis to paradigm
Abstract：
We argue that broad, simple generalizations, not specifically linked to contingencies, will rarely approach truth in ecology and evolutionary biology. This is because most interesting phenomena have multiple, interacting causes. Instead of looking for single universal theories to explain the great diversity of natural systems, we suggest that it would be profitable to develop general explanatory 'frameworks'. A framework should clearly specify focal levels. The process or pattern that we wish to study defines our level of focus. The set of potential and actual states at the focal level interacts with conditions at the contiguous lower and upper levels of organization, through sets of many-to-one and one-to-many connections. The number of initiating conditions and their permutations at the lower level define the potential states at the focal level, whereas the actual state is constrained by the upper-level boundary conditions. The most useful generalizations are explanatory frameworks, which are road maps to solutions, rather than solutions themselves. Such frameworks outline what is understood about boundary conditions and initiating conditions so that an investigator can pick and choose what is required to effectively understand a specific event or situation. We discuss these relationships in terms of examples involving sex ratio and mating behavior, competitive hierarchies, insect life-histories and the evolution of sex.
Keywords: bottom-up pluralism; competitive hierarchies; contingency; explanation; generalization; life-history; many-to-one; mating behavior; multiple causation; nested hierarchy; one-to-many; scale; sex; sex ratio; triadic system; truth
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006636918716
Source：BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY
Welcome to correct the error, please contact email: humanisticspider@gmail.com
